<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DefensePolicy.org - News and Opinion from America&#039;s Defense and National Security Community</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defensepolicy.org/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defensepolicy.org</link>
	<description>News and Opinion from America&#039;s Defense and National Security Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Doubly Dumb</title>
		<link>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/dennis-laich/doubly-dumb</link>
		<comments>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/dennis-laich/doubly-dumb#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 04:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MG (Ret.) Dennis Laich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Policy Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senior Contributors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defensepolicy.org/?p=4546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several years ago I was visiting the U.S. Army War College at Carlisle Barracks and my host invited me to have lunch with a war college student who was a senior officer in the Mexican military. He laid out the status of the Mexican drug war at the time. Then, the drug war in Mexico [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-567" style="margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 10px; border-width: 1px; border-color: black; border-style: solid;" title="Laich-Photo-96x96" src="http://www.defensepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Laich-Photo-96x96.jpg" alt="" width="96" height="96" />Several years ago I was visiting the U.S. Army War College at Carlisle Barracks and my host invited me to have lunch with a war college student who was a senior officer in the Mexican military. He laid out the status of the Mexican drug war at the time. Then, the drug war in Mexico was nowhere “on my radar.” Since then I have followed it closely as it has become more intense and far reaching and U.S. civilian law enforcement and military have become more involved on both sides of the border. The U.S. press has also expanded its coverage. The effects of these drug wars in Mexico on overall violent deaths, official corruption, reluctance to invest, and civilian and military enforcements costs have been huge and are growing. Mexico is at the brink of being a failed narco state on our shared southern border of almost 2,000 miles; a compelling threat to our national security. To allow this to happen when there is a partial solution available to the U.S. would be dumb. If this same solution to the Mexican drug crisis would also help solve the U.S. budget deficit problem and we didn’t do it would also be dumb. Thus you have doubly dumb.</p>
<p>The action I allude to above is to legalize marijuana in the United States thus weakening the drug cartels by taking this revenue stream and tax marijuana in the U.S. as we do alcohol and tobacco; two equally pernicious but socially acceptable and heavily taxed vices. I am not suggesting that marijuana is “good” or “helpful.” I am suggesting that there are two good reasons for taking this action that substitutes being pragmatic and smart for being doubly dumb and hypocritical.</p>
<p><em>Major General (Ret.) Dennis Laich is the Director of the </em><em><a href="http://www.odupatriots.com">PATRIOTS Program</a> </em><em>(www.ODUPatriots.com) for veterans at Ohio Dominican University.</em></p>
<p><em>This entry is cross-posted at </em><a href="http://mglaich.blogspot.com/"><em>Generally Speaking</em></a><em>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/dennis-laich/doubly-dumb/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How I Will Spend 11.11.11</title>
		<link>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/ccavalier/how-i-will-spend-11-11-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/ccavalier/how-i-will-spend-11-11-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CCavalier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Policy Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Bloggers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defensepolicy.org/?p=1226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On this year&#8217;s Veterans Day, my children and I will start the day off by attending the Veteran&#8217;s Day Parade here in Fayetteville. They are featuring the Vietnam-era veterans at the parade this year. Next, we&#8217;re off to an event called &#8220;Tweet for Troops,&#8221; after which we will head over to my hometown to finish [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">On this year&#8217;s Veterans Day, my children and I will start the day off by attending the Veteran&#8217;s Day Parade here in Fayetteville. They are featuring the Vietnam-era veterans at the parade this year. Next, we&#8217;re off to an event called &#8220;Tweet for Troops,&#8221; after which we will head over to my hometown to finish off the day together with family. Hopefully this year&#8217;s Veterans Day will turn out better for us than last year&#8217;s, which I spent in the emergency room with my son (check out <a href="http://www.armytankerswife.com/2010/11/how-i-actually-spent-veterans-day.html">this blog post</a> to read about those escapades). However we each spend our day today, we should of course remember all the veterans of every war, past and present, and the sacrifices they continue to make.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Believe it or not, some Americans actually confuse Veterans Day with Memorial Day (check out my <a href="http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/ccavalier/reflections-on-memorial-day" target="_blank">blog post</a> about our 2011 Memorial Day too), but it&#8217;s important to distinguish the two. I actually got &#8220;married to the military,&#8221; so to speak, without really even knowing the difference. And it wasn&#8217;t until after I met my husband that I really began to learn and appreciate the unique and distinct history of Veterans Day. I think it&#8217;s imperative that all Americans know the history of Veterans Day so that we can honor our former service members properly.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Did you know that Veterans Day was formerly known as Armistice Day? It was originally set as a legal holiday to honor the end of hostilities of World War I, which officially took place on November 11, 1918. In legislation passed in 1938, November 11 was &#8220;dedicated to the cause of world peace and to be hereafter celebrated and known as &#8216;Armistice Day.&#8217;&#8221; Back then, this new holiday specifically recognized and honored World War I veterans.  But in 1954, Congress changed he law to allow the day to honor and recognize veterans of all wars and periods of service.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Veterans Day was actually my great-grandfather&#8217;s favorite holiday. Why, you ask? Well, because he said it was the one day that vets got to sit around telling their stories of WWI and WWII, what Fort Bragg used to be like, who the old USO stars were. My grandfather used to tell stories of the time when he was stationed in Nice, France as a payroll clerk for the U.S. Army. I really do miss hearing his stories of how it was for him and what he did. So this year, after I attend the Veteran&#8217;s Day ceremonies and parades, I will also go to the cemetery, talk with him, remember those stories quietly, and place a flag on his grave.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I think it is critally important for us as a nation to remember and recognize our veterans, as they have to live every day with the memories, some good but some also bad, of fighting our nation&#8217;s wars. To me, Veterans Day will always be celebration to honor America&#8217;s veterans for their patriotism, love of country, and willingness to serve and sacrifice for the common good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/ccavalier/how-i-will-spend-11-11-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arab Spring, Israeli Winter</title>
		<link>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/dennis-laich/arab-spring-israeli-winter</link>
		<comments>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/dennis-laich/arab-spring-israeli-winter#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MG (Ret.) Dennis Laich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Policy Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senior Contributors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defensepolicy.org/?p=1221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Middle East appears to be going through two seasons at the same time. On one hand we have the Arab Spring, where citizens have risen up, or are rising up, to challenge dictators and repressive governments in the name of democracy, freedom, transparency and dignity. The movement has generally been supported by Western nations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.defensepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Laich-Photo-96x96.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-567" style="margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 10px; border-width: 1px; border-color: black; border-style: solid;" title="Laich-Photo-96x96" src="http://www.defensepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Laich-Photo-96x96.jpg" alt="" width="96" height="96" /></a>The Middle East appears to be going through two seasons at the same time. On one hand we have the Arab Spring, where citizens have risen up, or are rising up, to challenge dictators and repressive governments in the name of democracy, freedom, transparency and dignity. The movement has generally been supported by Western nations including the United States even though the movement&#8217;s ultimate outcomes &#8211; or in many cases, its leaders &#8211; are unknown. On the other hand, we see an Israeli Winter, where Israel is becoming increasingly isolated in the Middle East and, as a result, increasingly paranoid (which some may argue is justified).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This paranoia has lead to an alarming development in Israeli politics and public opinion. Recent reports in the Israeli press indicate the Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak are working to convince other members of the cabinet and Israeli security officials that Israel must launch a preemptive strike on Iran‘s nuclear program. Israel has taken such actions in the past. In 1981, Israeli aircraft bombed an unfinished nuclear reactor in Iraq, destroying that country’s nuclear program. And in 2007 Israeli warplanes destroyed a site in Syria that the U.N. nuclear watchdog deemed a secretly built nuclear reactor. Neither country retaliated against these acts of aggression. As to public opinion., the Dialog polling institute recently reported that 41% of the Israeli public said they would support an attack and 37% would oppose an attack (with a 4.6% margin of error).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I believe it is wishful thinking to believe that Iran would not respond militarily to an Israeli attack and that the exchange might not lead to a wider war, perhaps involving most, if not all, of the Middle East. If this were to occur, there is no reason to believe that the U.S. would not be drawn into the war. Given the current readiness of the U.S. military after ten years of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, the state of the world economy, and the current U.S. budget deficit and debt, a total war in the Middle East is the last thing America can afford in terms of blood and treasure. Someone at the White House should call Prime Minister Netanyahu and tell him in the most unambiguous terms as possible that attacking Iran’s suspected nuclear sites is not acceptable and that if he chooses to do so nevertheless, he and his country are on their own in dealing with the consequences. The U.S. can no longer afford to be a dog that is wagged by its tail.</p>
<p><em>Major General (Ret.) Dennis Laich is the Director of the </em><em><a href="http://www.odupatriots.com">PATRIOTS Program</a> </em><em>(www.ODUPatriots.com) for veterans at Ohio Dominican University.</em></p>
<p><em>This entry is cross-posted at </em><a href="http://mglaich.blogspot.com/"><em>Generally Speaking</em></a><em>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/dennis-laich/arab-spring-israeli-winter/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leaving Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/dennis-laich/leaving-iraq</link>
		<comments>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/dennis-laich/leaving-iraq#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MG (Ret.) Dennis Laich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Policy Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senior Contributors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defensepolicy.org/?p=1216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am constantly aware of the danger of crossing over from skeptic to cynic as an observer of American national security affairs. Nevertheless I am astonished by the reaction last week to President Obama’s announcement that U.S. troops will leave Iraq after eight years of war, over 4,400 U.S. lives, and more than a trillion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.defensepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Laich-Photo-96x96.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-567" style="margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 10px; border-width: 1px; border-color: black; border-style: solid;" title="Laich-Photo-96x96" src="http://www.defensepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Laich-Photo-96x96.jpg" alt="" width="96" height="96" /></a>I am constantly aware of the danger of crossing over from skeptic to cynic as an observer of American national security affairs. Nevertheless I am astonished by the reaction last week to President Obama’s announcement that U.S. troops will leave Iraq after eight years of war, over 4,400 U.S. lives, and more than a trillion dollars spent. My astonishment exists at the political, the strategic and the individual level.</p>
<p>Political opponents of President Obama such as Mitt Romney, Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham and others are criticizing him for executing a status of force agreement negotiated by George W. Bush, who the last I looked, is a fellow Republican. Bush negotiated this agreement before leaving office and Obama never repudiated it. In fact Obama is doing exactly what many Americans say they would like to have elected officials do; fulfill campaign promises. Candidate Obama said he would get us out of Iraq in a first term and never compromised that promise. (I, too, wish he had delivered on some others).</p>
<p>Strategically, some people believe and would like to have others believe that the U.S. now has and will have more influence in Iraq than Iran has. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said recently on Meet the Press, “No one should miscalculate America’s resolve and commitment to helping support the Iraqi democracy” and “We have paid too high a price to give Iraqis the chance. And I hope that Iran and no one else miscalculate that.” The fact is that Iran and Iraq are closely aligned by geography, religion, language, trade and a debt owed to Iran by current Iraqi leaders who lived in exile in Iran during Saddam Hussein’s rule. Muctada al Sadar, a radical cleric who is an Iranian proxy, is the power broker who kept the head of Iraq, Nuri al Maliki, in place. Furthermore the rational for keeping a U.S. military presence in Iraq, protecting Iraqi airspace, stabilizing its borders, and being an intelligence resource do not pass any rational test of demonstrated U.S. capability or intent.</p>
<p>Finally, I have had a number of conversations with my friends, neighbors and acquaintances who feel strongly that the withdrawal is a mistake. The irony of their position is that it not only lacks facts but more importantly the lack of commitment or investment. None of them served in the military and none of them have children or grandchildren who are serving in the military. So when I ask them if they are willing to pay a quarterly war tax to finance the Iraq war or have their children and/or grandchildren drafted to serve in Iraq, all say NO thus identifying themselves a chicken hawks at worst or uninformed limited liability patriots at best.</p>
<p><em>Major General (Ret.) Dennis Laich is the Director of the </em><em><a href="http://www.odupatriots.com">PATRIOTS Program</a> </em><em>(www.ODUPatriots.com) for veterans at Ohio Dominican University.</em></p>
<p><em>This entry is cross-posted at </em><a href="http://mglaich.blogspot.com/"><em>Generally Speaking</em></a><em>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/dennis-laich/leaving-iraq/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure</title>
		<link>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/dennis-laich/failure</link>
		<comments>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/dennis-laich/failure#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MG (Ret.) Dennis Laich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Policy Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senior Contributors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defensepolicy.org/?p=1212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing that every U.S. official, military and civilian, who has  responsibility for Afghanistan agrees upon is that the eradication of the poppy crop in Afghanistan is critical to defeating the Taliban and establishing some form of stable, democratic, central government there.   The United Nations drug control agency reported earlier this week that the amount [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.defensepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Laich-Photo-96x96.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-567" style="margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 10px; border: 1px solid black;" title="Laich-Photo-96x96" src="http://www.defensepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Laich-Photo-96x96.jpg" alt="" width="96" height="96" /></a>One thing that every U.S. official, military and civilian, who has  responsibility for Afghanistan agrees upon is that the eradication of the poppy crop in Afghanistan is critical to defeating the Taliban and establishing some form of stable, democratic, central government there.   The United Nations drug control agency reported earlier this week that the amount of land sown with poppies increased by 7% this year.  It was the second consecutive year that poppy cultivation rose.  This rise has occurred despite hundreds of millions of dollars spent by the U.S. government to disrupt opium smuggling operations and the insurgent networks that profit from them.</p>
<p>Afghan economic realities trump American aspirations and “magical thinking”.  We are trying to convince Afghan farmers who have cultivated poppies for generations to grow wheat, pomegranates and saffron instead of poppies which can yield more than $4000 per acre.  Do the math. What would you grow?  Because of rising prices and higher production the value of the opium produced in Afghanistan is set to more than double this year to $1.4 billion equal to 9% of Afghanistan’s GDP and approximately equal to the government’s annual tax revenues.  The majority of that $1.4 billion will flow to the Taliban and Afghan warlords.</p>
<p>After several years of asking the question, “What does success (winning) in Afghanistan look like?” without anything resembling a good answer, I may be a step closer by identifying failure.</p>
<p><em>Major General (Ret.) Dennis Laich is the Director of the </em><em><a href="http://www.odupatriots.com">PATRIOTS Program</a> </em><em>(www.ODUPatriots.com) for veterans at Ohio Dominican University.</em></p>
<p><em>This entry is cross-posted at </em><a href="http://mglaich.blogspot.com/"><em>Generally Speaking</em></a><em>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/dennis-laich/failure/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Debated Cyberwarfare in Attack Plan on Libya</title>
		<link>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/u-s-cyber-weapons-had-been-considered-to-disrupt-gaddafi%e2%80%99s-air-defenses</link>
		<comments>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/u-s-cyber-weapons-had-been-considered-to-disrupt-gaddafi%e2%80%99s-air-defenses#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 01:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DefensePolicy.org</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Senior Contributors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defensepolicy.org/?p=1202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read more at the New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/18/world/africa/cyber-warfare-against-libya-was-debated-by-us.html?_r=1&#38;hp]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read more at the New York Times:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/18/world/africa/cyber-warfare-against-libya-was-debated-by-us.html?_r=1&amp;hp">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/18/world/africa/cyber-warfare-against-libya-was-debated-by-us.html?_r=1&amp;hp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/u-s-cyber-weapons-had-been-considered-to-disrupt-gaddafi%e2%80%99s-air-defenses/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Policy on KIA bracelets stokes Marines’ fury</title>
		<link>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/policy-on-kia-bracelets-stokes-marines%e2%80%99-fury</link>
		<comments>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/policy-on-kia-bracelets-stokes-marines%e2%80%99-fury#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 01:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DefensePolicy.org</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defensepolicy.org/?p=1200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read more at the Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/checkpoint-washington/post/policy-on-kia-bracelets-stokes-marines-fury/2011/10/14/gIQAQVV9qL_blog.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read more at the Washington Post:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/checkpoint-washington/post/policy-on-kia-bracelets-stokes-marines-fury/2011/10/14/gIQAQVV9qL_blog.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/checkpoint-washington/post/policy-on-kia-bracelets-stokes-marines-fury/2011/10/14/gIQAQVV9qL_blog.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/policy-on-kia-bracelets-stokes-marines%e2%80%99-fury/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>W.H. rebuts Iraq troops report</title>
		<link>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/w-h-rebuts-iraq-troops-report</link>
		<comments>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/w-h-rebuts-iraq-troops-report#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DefensePolicy.org</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defensepolicy.org/?p=1197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read more at Politico: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/66050.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read more at Politico:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/66050.html">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/66050.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/w-h-rebuts-iraq-troops-report/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top senators open to changes in military health</title>
		<link>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/top-senators-open-to-changes-in-military-health</link>
		<comments>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/top-senators-open-to-changes-in-military-health#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DefensePolicy.org</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defensepolicy.org/?p=1206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read more at Military.com: http://militarytimes.com/news/2011/10/ap-top-senators-open-to-changes-in-military-health-101411/?org=403&#38;lvl=100&#38;ite=136&#38;lea=3258&#38;ctr=0&#38;par=1]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read more at Military.com:</p>
<p><a href="http://militarytimes.com/news/2011/10/ap-top-senators-open-to-changes-in-military-health-101411/?org=403&amp;lvl=100&amp;ite=136&amp;lea=3258&amp;ctr=0&amp;par=1">http://militarytimes.com/news/2011/10/ap-top-senators-open-to-changes-in-military-health-101411/?org=403&amp;lvl=100&amp;ite=136&amp;lea=3258&amp;ctr=0&amp;par=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/top-senators-open-to-changes-in-military-health/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama will deploy troops to Africa</title>
		<link>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/obama-will-deploy-troops-to-africa</link>
		<comments>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/obama-will-deploy-troops-to-africa#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DefensePolicy.org</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defensepolicy.org/?p=1195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read more at Politico: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65989.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read more at Politico:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65989.html">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65989.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defensepolicy.org/2011/janicholson3/obama-will-deploy-troops-to-africa/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
